Skip to content

Are we Neandermans or Neandumans?

12 April, 2014

Neanderthal DNAScience and Nature have just published research that supports a hypothesis about Neanderthal-human hybridisation that I published with Professor Roger Valentine Short in 2011. The recent popularity of the hybridisation theory was also reported in Nature newsFox News, and National Public Radio.

I was first inspired to think deeply about patterns of interbreeding between Neanderthals and humans while teaching Human Evolution and Diversity at Macquarie University in 2010. I approached Roger Short from Melbourne University with some of my ideas and we ended up writing a paper together. Famous for his work on elephants, Roger has also worked on hybridising camels and lamas. His work on Haldane’s law was a crucial part to building our Neanderthal-human hybridisation hypothesis.

Africans do not have Neanderthal ancestry. Interbreeding between Neanderthals and humans occurred as some groups migrated outside Africa between 80,000 years and 50,000 years ago. Looking at experimental studies of nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA from both humans and Neanderthals, Roger Short and I have hypothesised that Neanderthal men mated successfully with female humans but not vice-versa. Turning to Haldane’s law, we conjectured that the offspring were predominantly female hybrids. Male hybrids were uncommon, absent or sterile. Beyond the evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, this hypothesis also gels well with data from the Y chromosome that indicates that the human Y chromosomes came entirely from Africa. The recent experimental work published in Science and Nature bolsters our excitement in the hybridisation hypothesis. Great-Great-Great Grandma, as it turns out, was likely the hybrid offspring of a Neanderthal male and a female human.

In science, the method of naming hybrid offspring usually follows the rule that the first half of the name comes from the male parent and the second half comes from the female parent. For example, a liger is the offspring of a male lion and a female tiger, a cama is the offspring of a male camel and a female llama, and a zorse is the offspring of a male zebra and a female horse. Given this conventional naming practice for hybrids, should humans living outside of Africa actually call themselves NEANDUMANS? What do you think?



Neanderthal-human hybrids
The Origin and Future of Modern Humans

My great-great-great grandfather’s a Neanderthal
Did better mothering defeat the Neanderthals?
Ancient tryst fortified human immune systems

Other authors who have looked at the problem of Neanderthal-human hybridisation:

Kaleigh Eichel;

Karenleigh A. Overmann & Frederick L. Coolidge;

Chuan-Chao Wang, Sara E. Farina, & Hui Li;

Todd R. Disotell

Barbra Dozier

Dienekes and Dienekes

Razib Khan


John Hawks on Neanderthals:

Sean Carroll on hybrids:


5 Comments leave one →
  1. Numan permalink
    29 April, 2014 11:31 am

    Following the trend of the newborn Zonkey, I vote for Numan. “Hello, Numan!”

  2. Benton West permalink
    10 May, 2014 2:23 pm

    Did we get parts of our X chromosome from male Neanderthals? If so, does this have implications for how we understand diseases, autoimmune disorders and other conditions that affect one sex more than the other?

  3. Benton West permalink
    10 May, 2014 2:24 pm


  4. Mathilda Hawks permalink
    26 May, 2014 4:32 pm


  5. Danielle permalink
    1 September, 2014 5:53 am

    According to your article, the correct name would be Numan, no?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: