<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engaged skepticism about Minerva</title>
	<atom:link href="http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/engaged-skepticism-about-minerva/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/engaged-skepticism-about-minerva/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Minerva awards announced &#8211; no anthropologists funded &#171; Culture Matters</title>
		<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/engaged-skepticism-about-minerva/#comment-5847</link>
		<dc:creator>Minerva awards announced &#8211; no anthropologists funded &#171; Culture Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturematters.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-5847</guid>
		<description>[...] You can go to the DoD media release for more details, but in case you&#8217;re wondering if David Vine&#8217;s proposed Minerva research got funded, the answer is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can go to the DoD media release for more details, but in case you&#8217;re wondering if David Vine&#8217;s proposed Minerva research got funded, the answer is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weaponized irony &#171; Culture Matters</title>
		<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/engaged-skepticism-about-minerva/#comment-5561</link>
		<dc:creator>Weaponized irony &#171; Culture Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturematters.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-5561</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Princeton declined to forward [the proposal] to Lockheed.&#8221;  It puts me in mind of David Vine&#8217;s vow to write a proposal for Minerva funding from the Pentagon to study &#8220;how overseas military [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Princeton declined to forward [the proposal] to Lockheed.&#8221;  It puts me in mind of David Vine&#8217;s vow to write a proposal for Minerva funding from the Pentagon to study &#8220;how overseas military [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llwynn</title>
		<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/engaged-skepticism-about-minerva/#comment-4329</link>
		<dc:creator>llwynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturematters.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-4329</guid>
		<description>Thanks for weighing in, David.  So can I ask you a question?  What&#039;s the jargon that we anthropologists can&#039;t stop ourselves from using at inopportune moments?  Seriously, I want to know, because I&#039;m chronically jargony myself and I&#039;m trying to train myself out of it.  

Maybe that&#039;s a hopeless question, though, since you&#039;re more likely to just tune out the jargon rather than remember it well enough to repeat it later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for weighing in, David.  So can I ask you a question?  What&#8217;s the jargon that we anthropologists can&#8217;t stop ourselves from using at inopportune moments?  Seriously, I want to know, because I&#8217;m chronically jargony myself and I&#8217;m trying to train myself out of it.  </p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s a hopeless question, though, since you&#8217;re more likely to just tune out the jargon rather than remember it well enough to repeat it later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Axe</title>
		<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/engaged-skepticism-about-minerva/#comment-4328</link>
		<dc:creator>David Axe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturematters.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-4328</guid>
		<description>Hi.

I was on that conference call and took good notes. If Low&#039;s comments were intended to apply only to Minerva, she certainly didn&#039;t say so. In my questions I asked about all military programs involving the social sciences, and that includes HTS.

It&#039;s clear now that AAA has a very specific agenda it&#039;s pushing regarding military programs. I&#039;m not entirely clear what that agenda is. But one thing&#039;s clear: if you&#039;re going to engage the press, you need to learn how to run a teleconference. The AAA conference call was, at its best moments, hopelessly overburdened with jargon and entirely too rigid in its format. It&#039;s no wonder there has been confusion in the aftermath.

But since I asked what I thought were clear questions, and got what sounded like clear answers, I&#039;m sticking by my reporting. I can&#039;t allow a public affairs flack to rewrite a conversation after the fact.

Best,

David Axe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p>
<p>I was on that conference call and took good notes. If Low&#8217;s comments were intended to apply only to Minerva, she certainly didn&#8217;t say so. In my questions I asked about all military programs involving the social sciences, and that includes HTS.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear now that AAA has a very specific agenda it&#8217;s pushing regarding military programs. I&#8217;m not entirely clear what that agenda is. But one thing&#8217;s clear: if you&#8217;re going to engage the press, you need to learn how to run a teleconference. The AAA conference call was, at its best moments, hopelessly overburdened with jargon and entirely too rigid in its format. It&#8217;s no wonder there has been confusion in the aftermath.</p>
<p>But since I asked what I thought were clear questions, and got what sounded like clear answers, I&#8217;m sticking by my reporting. I can&#8217;t allow a public affairs flack to rewrite a conversation after the fact.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>David Axe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/engaged-skepticism-about-minerva/#comment-4327</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturematters.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-4327</guid>
		<description>So if I understand Damon Dozer correctly, what he seems to be saying is that the American Anthropological Issociation&#039;s investigation and official Probe of Human Terrain Systems is OFFICIALLY SECRET and it must not be discussed in public until the committee has finished it&#039;s work.  In fact, the AAA can&#039;t even admit that probe is underway. Makes good sense to keep it secret until the investigation is concluded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I understand Damon Dozer correctly, what he seems to be saying is that the American Anthropological Issociation&#8217;s investigation and official Probe of Human Terrain Systems is OFFICIALLY SECRET and it must not be discussed in public until the committee has finished it&#8217;s work.  In fact, the AAA can&#8217;t even admit that probe is underway. Makes good sense to keep it secret until the investigation is concluded</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
