<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News of anthropologists in the military starts circulating on Muslim website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/news-of-anthropologists-in-the-military-starts-circulating-on-muslim-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/news-of-anthropologists-in-the-military-starts-circulating-on-muslim-websites/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: llwynn</title>
		<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/news-of-anthropologists-in-the-military-starts-circulating-on-muslim-websites/#comment-2657</link>
		<dc:creator>llwynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/news-of-anthropologists-in-the-military-starts-circulating-on-muslim-websites/#comment-2657</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, Kerim over at Savage Minds has a very funny spoof posting about Al-Qaeda using Edward Said&#039;s theories against the American counter-insurgency... http://savageminds.org/2007/11/01/the-intellectual-arms-race/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, Kerim over at Savage Minds has a very funny spoof posting about Al-Qaeda using Edward Said&#8217;s theories against the American counter-insurgency&#8230; <a href="http://savageminds.org/2007/11/01/the-intellectual-arms-race/" rel="nofollow">http://savageminds.org/2007/11/01/the-intellectual-arms-race/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llwynn</title>
		<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/news-of-anthropologists-in-the-military-starts-circulating-on-muslim-websites/#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator>llwynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/news-of-anthropologists-in-the-military-starts-circulating-on-muslim-websites/#comment-2654</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not exactly sure how to answer your query, TTD, since it seems to hinge on what you consider &quot;moderate stuff&quot; and how you evaluate reactions to the cartoon wars (you don&#039;t say, but seem to imply, that the reactions were not &#039;moderate&#039;).  

Qaradawi is an influential scholar and his name frequently appeared in the press in connection with discussions about the offensiveness of the cartoons and protests against them.  Here is an article that discusses his approach to dealing with the cartoons, compared to that of the charismatic Egyptian preacher Amr Khaled: http://www.tbsjournal.com/Wise.htm.  As the article makes clear, Qaradawi was not interested in immediately smoothing over relationships between Muslims and non-Muslims after the cartoon was published and instead advocated using it as an opportunity to &quot;unify the ummah&quot; -- i.e. the community of believers -- in opposition to an offensive Western attack on Islam.  

But is that an &#039;extremist&#039; position?  There is a fatwa on his website that specifically addresses the ways to protest offensive cartoons of the prophet which advocates peaceful protest and says that violent protests such as setting fire to Danish embassies are not acceptable.  See http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&amp;cid=1139318348431
Note that, although appearing on the website founded by Qaradawi, this &quot;group fatwa,&quot; if you will, was produced by three North American Islamic scholars.  

Note also this other item filed in their &#039;fatwa bank&#039; -- it&#039;s not really a fatwa, though; it&#039;s a response to a questioner who says, &quot;Why are Muslims so upset over the sketches from Denmark of their Prophet? It seems to me the &quot;mighty Islam&quot; is really a weak religion when you have to get so upset over such a trivial thing.&quot;:
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&amp;cid=1139326439284
I find it striking that they answer such a question on their website.  It&#039;s an attempt to explain why sentiments ran so high over the cartoon, and in its earnest engagement in dialogue with a questioner who implicitly insults the religion, it seems to me to be very &#039;moderate.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not exactly sure how to answer your query, TTD, since it seems to hinge on what you consider &#8220;moderate stuff&#8221; and how you evaluate reactions to the cartoon wars (you don&#8217;t say, but seem to imply, that the reactions were not &#8216;moderate&#8217;).  </p>
<p>Qaradawi is an influential scholar and his name frequently appeared in the press in connection with discussions about the offensiveness of the cartoons and protests against them.  Here is an article that discusses his approach to dealing with the cartoons, compared to that of the charismatic Egyptian preacher Amr Khaled: <a href="http://www.tbsjournal.com/Wise.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.tbsjournal.com/Wise.htm</a>.  As the article makes clear, Qaradawi was not interested in immediately smoothing over relationships between Muslims and non-Muslims after the cartoon was published and instead advocated using it as an opportunity to &#8220;unify the ummah&#8221; &#8212; i.e. the community of believers &#8212; in opposition to an offensive Western attack on Islam.  </p>
<p>But is that an &#8216;extremist&#8217; position?  There is a fatwa on his website that specifically addresses the ways to protest offensive cartoons of the prophet which advocates peaceful protest and says that violent protests such as setting fire to Danish embassies are not acceptable.  See <a href="http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&amp;cid=1139318348431" rel="nofollow">http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&amp;cid=1139318348431</a><br />
Note that, although appearing on the website founded by Qaradawi, this &#8220;group fatwa,&#8221; if you will, was produced by three North American Islamic scholars.  </p>
<p>Note also this other item filed in their &#8216;fatwa bank&#8217; &#8212; it&#8217;s not really a fatwa, though; it&#8217;s a response to a questioner who says, &#8220;Why are Muslims so upset over the sketches from Denmark of their Prophet? It seems to me the &#8220;mighty Islam&#8221; is really a weak religion when you have to get so upset over such a trivial thing.&#8221;:<br />
<a href="http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&amp;cid=1139326439284" rel="nofollow">http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&amp;cid=1139326439284</a><br />
I find it striking that they answer such a question on their website.  It&#8217;s an attempt to explain why sentiments ran so high over the cartoon, and in its earnest engagement in dialogue with a questioner who implicitly insults the religion, it seems to me to be very &#8216;moderate.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Tone Devil</title>
		<link>http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/news-of-anthropologists-in-the-military-starts-circulating-on-muslim-websites/#comment-2649</link>
		<dc:creator>Third Tone Devil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 04:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://culturematters.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/news-of-anthropologists-in-the-military-starts-circulating-on-muslim-websites/#comment-2649</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of China, where Western researchers are automatically presumed to represent the putative interests of their nations, just as Chinese are. It doesn&#039;t mean they are bad; this is just the order of things in a world where nations are locked in a fight for power. That is the prevalent view. (See my other blog: chinasaysno.wordpress.com).

But isn&#039;t Yusuf Qaradawi the chap who is credited with much of the responsibility for the Muhammad cartoon wars? If so, I am surprised that his website publishes such moderate stuff. I am sure there is a more complex connection. Can you explain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of China, where Western researchers are automatically presumed to represent the putative interests of their nations, just as Chinese are. It doesn&#8217;t mean they are bad; this is just the order of things in a world where nations are locked in a fight for power. That is the prevalent view. (See my other blog: chinasaysno.wordpress.com).</p>
<p>But isn&#8217;t Yusuf Qaradawi the chap who is credited with much of the responsibility for the Muhammad cartoon wars? If so, I am surprised that his website publishes such moderate stuff. I am sure there is a more complex connection. Can you explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
